SFY vs. QQQM
SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 15.91%/yr vs 17.94%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
SFY vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.73% return.
SFY
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 27.66%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 20.73%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SFY vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 14.75% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 7.37% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 20.73% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFY and QQQM is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SFY and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SFY vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFY
QQQM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SFY
QQQM
Communication Services
SFY
QQQM
Financial Services
SFY
QQQM
Healthcare
SFY
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
SFY
QQQM
Industrials
SFY
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
SFY
QQQM
Energy
SFY
QQQM
Utilities
SFY
QQQM
Real Estate
SFY
QQQM
Basic Materials
SFY
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFY vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
SFY
QQQM
SFY vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.44 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.43 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.42 | 13.15 | +1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.58 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.81 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
SFY vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -35.04% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -11.96% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.04% | -22.70% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -35.04% | +7.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.75% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -8.24% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 3.11% | -0.64% |
Volatility
SFY vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) is 4.00%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that SFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFY | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.51% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 12.06% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.44% | 15.91% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 22.23% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 22.11% | -1.92% |
SFY vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFY vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SFY and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to SFY (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 17.94% vs 15.91% for SFY. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SFY has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 15.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.
SFY has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.42% for QQQM.
SFY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFY and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer