SFY vs. OUSA
SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 14.00%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for OUSA. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.
Performance
SFY vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 7.09% return.
SFY
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.49%
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $872.37K | $1.31M | $1.44M | |
| $1.57M | $2.21M | $2.73M |
SFY vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 12.78% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 24.52% | 13.72% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 7.09% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFY and OUSA is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SFY and OUSA has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SFY vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFY
OUSA
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SFY
OUSA
Financial Services
SFY
OUSA
Healthcare
SFY
OUSA
Communication Services
SFY
OUSA
Consumer Cyclical
SFY
OUSA
Industrials
SFY
OUSA
Consumer Defensive
SFY
OUSA
Utilities
SFY
OUSA
-
Energy
SFY
OUSA
-
Basic Materials
SFY
OUSA
-
Real Estate
SFY
OUSA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFY vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
SFY
OUSA
SFY vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFY | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.95 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 6.80 | +1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFY vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, roughly equal to the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and OUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFY | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -33.12% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -8.36% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.04% | -13.14% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -19.54% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -0.23% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -3.50% | -2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.39% | +0.50% |
Volatility
SFY vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.65%. This indicates that SFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFY | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 3.65% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 8.12% | +4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 10.25% | +5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 13.38% | +5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 15.19% | +5.01% |
SFY vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFY vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.35% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFY and OUSA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFY has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to OUSA (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs OUSA's -33.12%.
On 5-year performance, SFY leads with 14.00% vs 8.96% for OUSA. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SFY has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.84% for SFY.
SFY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. SFY tracks Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: SoFi and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFY and OUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer