SFY vs. LBAY
SFY (SoFi Select 500 ETF) and LBAY (Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive SoFi US 500 Growth Index, while LBAY is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. SFY is passively managed, while LBAY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFY returned 15.86%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for LBAY. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFY charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for LBAY.
Performance
SFY vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFY achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than LBAY's 6.38% return.
SFY
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 14.51%
- 6M
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 35.49%
- 3Y*
- 27.51%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
LBAY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SFY vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 14.51% | 22.67% | 29.81% | 29.36% | -22.84% | 28.03% | 4.54% |
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 6.38% | 4.08% | -3.49% | -8.54% | 22.41% | 22.27% | 4.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFY and LBAY is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SFY and LBAY shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SFY vs. LBAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFY
LBAY
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SFY
LBAY
Communication Services
SFY
LBAY
-
Financial Services
SFY
LBAY
Healthcare
SFY
LBAY
Consumer Cyclical
SFY
LBAY
Industrials
SFY
LBAY
Consumer Defensive
SFY
LBAY
Energy
SFY
LBAY
Utilities
SFY
LBAY
Real Estate
SFY
LBAY
Basic Materials
SFY
LBAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFY vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank
SFY
LBAY
SFY vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFY | LBAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.10 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 0.66 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.43 | 1.67 | +12.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFY | LBAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 0.51 | +1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.28 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.58 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SFY vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFY drawdown since its inception was -33.25%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFY and LBAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFY | LBAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.25% | -15.99% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.79% | -11.91% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.04% | -14.57% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.72% | -15.99% | -11.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -10.72% | +9.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.80% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 4.66% | -2.19% |
Volatility
SFY vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison
SoFi Select 500 ETF (SFY) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 3.78%. This indicates that SFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFY | LBAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 3.78% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 12.87% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.45% | 15.25% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 13.59% | +5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 13.73% | +6.47% |
SFY vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFY has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFY vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison
SFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than LBAY's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF | 3.80% | 3.80% | 3.77% | 3.47% | 2.74% | 2.96% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
SFY SoFi Select 500 ETF | 0.84% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 0.90% | 1.18% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFY and LBAY have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFY has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to LBAY (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFY dropped -33.25% vs LBAY's -15.99%.
On 5-year performance, SFY leads with 15.86% vs 3.82% for LBAY. On fees, SFY is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, LBAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SFY has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFY is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.
LBAY has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 0.84% for SFY.
SFY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LBAY is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFY and 1.09% for LBAY.
SFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFY and LBAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer