SFM vs. SMH
SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, SFM returned 14.44%/yr vs 37.85%/yr for SMH. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SFM vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFM achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SFM has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 14.44%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.85% annualized return.
SFM
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- -51.23%
- 3Y*
- 34.82%
- 5Y*
- 26.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
SFM vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 6.08% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 9.06% | 47.66% | 3.88% | -17.69% | -3.45% | 28.70% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFM and SMH is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.16 |
The correlation between SFM and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFM vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
SFM
SMH
SFM vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.58 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 9.31 | -10.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 33.88 | -35.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFM vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFM drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFM and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.88% | -84.96% | +12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.35% | -14.93% | -46.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.48% | -35.74% | -27.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.48% | -45.30% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.48% | -45.30% | -18.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.93% | -7.01% | -45.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.30% | -41.01% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.12% | 4.10% | +42.02% |
Volatility
SFM vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is 13.13%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that SFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFM | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 19.08% | -5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.98% | 29.18% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.47% | 34.87% | +11.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.32% | 35.83% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.89% | 32.97% | +4.92% |
Dividends
SFM vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
SFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFM and SMH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to SFM (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFM dropped -72.88% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFM and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer