SFLTX vs. NAINX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SFLTX (Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund) and NAINX (Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - SFLTX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Virtus, while NAINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Virtus. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SFLTX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NAINX.

Performance

SFLTX vs. NAINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund (SFLTX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SFLTX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

NAINX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -1.84%
• 6M: -0.45%
• YTD: -0.04%
• 1Y: 0.10%
• 3Y*: 8.14%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 7.65%
• ALL TIME*: 6.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SFLTX vs. NAINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SFLTX Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund	1.19%	3.51%	-0.51%	6.29%	-8.67%	0.05%	6.67%	7.55%	0.22%	5.40%
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	-0.04%	6.83%	14.00%	22.38%	-28.48%	6.63%	31.47%	28.49%	-7.19%	19.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLTX and NAINX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995	0.04

Over the past year, SFLTX and NAINX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SFLTX vs. NAINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SFLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NAINX

NAINX Risk / Return Rank: 4
NAINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NAINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NAINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NAINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
NAINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFLTX vs. NAINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund (SFLTX) and Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFLTX	NAINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.06	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.99	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.09	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.28	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLTX	NAINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.50%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-2.30%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.26%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SFLTX	NAINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	9.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	13.78%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.30%	—

SFLTX vs. NAINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than NAINX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFLTX vs. NAINX - Dividend Comparison

SFLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than NAINX's 16.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund	16.05%	15.87%	13.38%	1.94%	7.34%	7.54%	2.06%	2.24%	4.41%	2.61%	10.78%	7.34%
SFLTX Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund	2.74%	2.94%	2.28%	2.34%	2.05%	2.02%	3.45%	3.66%	2.93%	2.43%	5.99%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFLTX and NAINX in my portfolio?

SFLTX and NAINX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.