SFLTX vs. PXSGX
SFLTX (Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund) and PXSGX (Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SFLTX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Virtus, while PXSGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Virtus. Over the past 10 years, SFLTX returned 1.70%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for PXSGX. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. SFLTX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for PXSGX.
Performance
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLTX achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than PXSGX's -8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLTX has underperformed PXSGX with an annualized return of 1.70%, while PXSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.
SFLTX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
PXSGX
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -8.38%
- 6M
- -9.79%
- 1Y
- -22.20%
- 3Y*
- -2.07%
- 5Y*
- -5.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLTX Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund | 1.19% | 3.51% | -0.51% | 6.29% | -8.67% | 0.05% | 6.67% | 7.55% | 0.22% | 5.40% |
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | -8.38% | -22.97% | 21.11% | 20.27% | -30.04% | 4.47% | 43.46% | 40.26% | 9.05% | 36.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLTX and PXSGX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2006 | -0.09 |
The correlation between SFLTX and PXSGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLTX vs. PXSGX — Risk / Return Rank
SFLTX
PXSGX
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund (SFLTX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFLTX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 0.83 | +0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | -0.74 | +2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | -1.25 | +7.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLTX drawdown since its inception was -13.50%, smaller than the maximum PXSGX drawdown of -53.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLTX and PXSGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLTX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.50% | -53.72% | +40.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.29% | -28.37% | +25.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.67% | -42.49% | +36.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.50% | -42.49% | +28.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.50% | -42.49% | +28.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -39.55% | +38.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -11.83% | +9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 16.78% | -15.77% |
Volatility
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund (SFLTX) is 0.99%, while Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund (PXSGX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that SFLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLTX | PXSGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 4.39% | -3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | 13.26% | -11.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 18.70% | -16.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 24.80% | -21.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.81% | 22.60% | -18.79% |
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLTX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PXSGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFLTX vs. PXSGX - Dividend Comparison
SFLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than PXSGX's 52.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXSGX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth Fund | 52.29% | 47.91% | 20.72% | 5.31% | 17.32% | 14.31% | 9.64% | 1.52% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.69% | 2.99% |
SFLTX Virtus Seix High Grade Municipal Bond Fund | 3.22% | 2.94% | 2.28% | 2.34% | 2.05% | 2.02% | 3.45% | 3.66% | 2.93% | 2.43% | 5.99% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFLTX and PXSGX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXSGX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SFLTX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLTX dropped -13.50% vs PXSGX's -53.72%.
SFLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLTX and PXSGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer