NAINX vs. PHRAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX).
NAINX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Sep 5, 1940. PHRAX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Mar 1, 1995.
Performance
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund | -6.27% | 6.83% | 14.00% | 22.38% | -28.48% | 6.63% | 31.47% | 28.49% | -7.19% | 19.84% |
PHRAX Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund | 4.52% | 0.23% | 10.15% | 10.98% | -26.33% | 46.79% | -1.98% | 27.09% | -7.41% | 5.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAINX achieves a -6.27% return, which is significantly lower than PHRAX's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, NAINX has outperformed PHRAX with an annualized return of 7.45%, while PHRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.51% annualized return.
NAINX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -6.27%
- 6M
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- 0.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
PHRAX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NAINX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than PHRAX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NAINX vs. PHRAX — Risk / Return Rank
NAINX
PHRAX
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) and Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NAINX | PHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.06 | 0.28 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.16 | 0.49 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.07 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 1.79 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NAINX | PHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 | 0.28 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.26 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.39 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between NAINX and PHRAX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Dividend Comparison
NAINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.17%, more than PHRAX's 5.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAINX Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund | 17.17% | 15.87% | 13.38% | 1.94% | 7.34% | 7.54% | 2.06% | 2.24% | 4.41% | 2.61% | 10.78% | 7.34% |
PHRAX Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund | 5.66% | 5.93% | 8.39% | 12.35% | 11.12% | 4.45% | 5.58% | 21.34% | 19.03% | 18.54% | 21.22% | 20.04% |
Drawdowns
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAINX drawdown since its inception was -36.50%, smaller than the maximum PHRAX drawdown of -72.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAINX and PHRAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAINX | PHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.50% | -72.56% | +36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -12.50% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.50% | -33.51% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.50% | -42.00% | +5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.37% | -6.10% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -11.42% | +6.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.13% | -0.43% |
Volatility
NAINX vs. PHRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Tactical Allocation Fund (NAINX) is 4.03%, while Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Securities Fund (PHRAX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that NAINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NAINX | PHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.54% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.54% | 9.20% | -2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 16.54% | -5.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 19.11% | -5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 20.98% | -7.71% |