SFLO vs. REGL
Compare and contrast key facts about Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL).
SFLO and REGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SFLO is a passively managed fund by Victory that tracks the performance of the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2023. REGL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both SFLO and REGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SFLO vs. REGL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SFLO vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 2.39% | 11.88% | 6.54% | -0.16% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.68% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 0.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than REGL's 3.68% return.
SFLO
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGL
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -5.49%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 9.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFLO vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SFLO vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank
SFLO
REGL
SFLO vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFLO | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.60 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 0.97 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.93 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 3.24 | +2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFLO | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.60 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLO and REGL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SFLO vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison
SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than REGL's 2.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.95% | 1.04% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
SFLO vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum REGL drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and REGL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLO | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -36.37% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.83% | -10.94% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -6.09% | +4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -4.09% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 3.13% | +0.77% |
Volatility
SFLO vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 4.30%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SFLO | REGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 4.30% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 9.20% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.97% | 16.26% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 16.11% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 18.31% | +2.48% |