SFLO vs. OSCV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) and OSCV (Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SFLO is passively managed, while OSCV is actively managed. Over the past year, SFLO returned 32.02% vs 13.62% for OSCV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OSCV.

Performance

SFLO vs. OSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly higher than OSCV's 8.34% return.

SFLO

• 1D: -1.52%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 6M: 12.24%
• 1Y: 32.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OSCV

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 8.34%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: 13.62%
• 3Y*: 10.05%
• 5Y*: 5.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLO vs. OSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	13.58%	11.88%	6.54%	-0.16%
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	8.34%	1.35%	11.66%	0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and OSCV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023	0.77

The correlation between SFLO and OSCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFLO vs. OSCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFLO	OSCV
Technology	25.6%	2.0%
Healthcare	18.0%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	16.9%	9.9%
Energy	14.8%	11.3%
Industrials	10.5%	17.0%
Communication Services	7.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.6%	5.6%
Financial Services	0.3%	27.6%
Utilities	0.1%	3.1%
Real Estate	0.1%	8.5%

Return for Risk

SFLO vs. OSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO

SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 63
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

OSCV

OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 31
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. OSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFLO	OSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.03	+0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	1.61	+1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.18	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.12	1.81	+2.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.73	5.34	+8.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFLO vs. OSCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the OSCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and OSCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFLO	OSCV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	1.03	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.36	+0.28

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. OSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum OSCV drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and OSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLO	OSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.63%	-42.40%	+15.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-7.55%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-3.46%	+0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-7.60%	+3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	2.55%	-0.21%

Volatility

SFLO vs. OSCV - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) at 3.47%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OSCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFLO	OSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	3.47%	+1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	9.45%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.30%	13.37%	+3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.55%	17.26%	+3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.55%	20.91%	-0.36%

SFLO vs. OSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OSCV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFLO vs. OSCV - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than OSCV's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
OSCV Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF	1.11%	1.23%	1.29%	1.55%	1.12%	1.06%	1.11%	1.75%	0.25%
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	0.85%	1.04%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFLO and OSCV in my portfolio?

SFLO and OSCV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFLO or OSCV?

SFLO has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to OSCV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs OSCV's -42.40%.

Which ETF is better, SFLO or OSCV?

On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 32.02% vs 13.62% for OSCV. On fees, SFLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OSCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFLO or OSCV?

Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 13.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFLO or OSCV?

SFLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OSCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFLO or OSCV?

OSCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.85% for SFLO.

What is the main difference between SFLO and OSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Victory and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.79% for OSCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.