SFLNX vs. SPEM
SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both funds - SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index, while SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX returned 14.31%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for SPEM. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFLNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 14.31%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.
SFLNX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 14.44%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
SPEM
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 14.44% | 17.02% | 16.78% | 18.16% | -6.89% | 31.64% | 9.12% | 28.91% | -7.43% | 17.08% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 11.32% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFLNX and SPEM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.71 |
The correlation between SFLNX and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFLNX
SPEM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SFLNX
SPEM
Financial Services
SFLNX
SPEM
Healthcare
SFLNX
SPEM
Communication Services
SFLNX
SPEM
Energy
SFLNX
SPEM
Industrials
SFLNX
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
SFLNX
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
SFLNX
SPEM
Basic Materials
SFLNX
SPEM
Utilities
SFLNX
SPEM
Real Estate
SFLNX
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFLNX vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
SFLNX
SPEM
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFLNX | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.29 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | 2.28 | +2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.68 | 8.16 | +11.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFLNX | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -64.41% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -11.36% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.27% | -17.62% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.98% | -31.75% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.59% | -36.06% | -1.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -2.40% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -14.73% | +8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 3.17% | -1.60% |
Volatility
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) is 3.17%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SFLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFLNX | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 6.87% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 14.21% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.59% | 16.67% | -6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.30% | 17.26% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 18.83% | -0.42% |
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFLNX vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.78% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 4.78% | 6.17% | 5.33% | 9.69% | 3.28% | 7.23% | 5.68% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 2.49% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFLNX and SPEM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SFLNX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLNX dropped -56.18% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFLNX and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer