PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 14.31%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
1.52%
1M
1.49%
YTD
14.44%
6M
13.87%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
14.31%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.44%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and SPEM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.71

The correlation between SFLNX and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFLNX
SPEM

Technology

19.0%
32.1%

Financial Services

13.9%
19.2%

Healthcare

11.9%
3.7%

Communication Services

10.3%
6.7%

Energy

10.2%
4.2%

Industrials

9.4%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.7%
8.0%

Utilities

3.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SFLNX
19.0%
SPEM
32.1%

Financial Services

SFLNX
13.9%
SPEM
19.2%

Healthcare

SFLNX
11.9%
SPEM
3.7%

Communication Services

SFLNX
10.3%
SPEM
6.7%

Energy

SFLNX
10.2%
SPEM
4.2%

Industrials

SFLNX
9.4%
SPEM
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SFLNX
9.2%
SPEM
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

SFLNX
7.4%
SPEM
3.6%

Basic Materials

SFLNX
3.7%
SPEM
8.0%

Utilities

SFLNX
3.2%
SPEM
2.8%

Real Estate

SFLNX
1.8%
SPEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFLNXSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.29

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

2.28

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.68

8.16

+11.52

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-64.41%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-11.36%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-17.62%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-31.75%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-36.06%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.40%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-14.73%

+8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

3.17%

-1.60%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) is 3.17%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SFLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

6.87%

-3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

14.21%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.59%

16.67%

-6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

17.26%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

18.83%

-0.42%

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.46%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFLNX and SPEM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SFLNX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLNX dropped -56.18% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLNX and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer