PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLNX vs. SFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
2.71%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
3.02%7.66%8.99%20.15%-14.79%30.91%8.49%24.44%-12.26%12.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLNX achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than SFSNX's 3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SFLNX has outperformed SFSNX with an annualized return of 13.25%, while SFSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.


SFLNX

1D
1.98%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
2.71%
6M
6.30%
1Y
19.89%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.25%

SFSNX

1D
2.53%
1M
-6.23%
YTD
3.02%
6M
4.44%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SFLNX and SFSNX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SFLNX vs. SFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SFSNX
SFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFLNXSFSNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

0.91

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.41

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.40

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

5.35

+2.87

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the SFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLNX and SFSNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFLNXSFSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.91

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.30

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.43

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.37

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between SFLNX and SFSNX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Dividend Comparison

SFLNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SFSNX's 1.32% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.63%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SFSNX
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund
1.32%1.36%1.71%1.37%7.05%12.27%1.42%3.66%11.55%6.88%1.86%6.37%

Drawdowns

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLNX drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SFSNX drawdown of -58.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLNX and SFSNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLNXSFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-58.32%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-14.38%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.98%

-25.91%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

-44.82%

+7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-6.99%

+2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-8.38%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.76%

-1.20%

Volatility

SFLNX vs. SFSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) is 4.01%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that SFLNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SFLNXSFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

6.41%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

12.75%

-4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

21.99%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

20.93%

-5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

23.26%

-4.85%