PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFBPX vs. MXLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund (SFBPX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFBPX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly higher than MXLGX's 6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SFBPX has underperformed MXLGX with an annualized return of 7.67%, while MXLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


SFBPX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.39%
YTD
8.59%
6M
8.95%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
7.67%

MXLGX

1D
0.18%
1M
5.24%
YTD
6.05%
6M
4.89%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFBPX
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund
8.59%14.49%8.93%13.80%-23.41%22.72%13.37%18.83%-6.02%13.08%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
6.05%13.93%25.30%33.43%-34.08%41.30%40.72%36.20%-0.47%28.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SFBPX and MXLGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.84

The correlation between SFBPX and MXLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFBPX vs. MXLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFBPX
SFBPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SFBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SFBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

MXLGX
MXLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MXLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund (SFBPX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFBPXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

1.43

+1.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

2.00

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.26

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.36

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.18

4.21

+9.96

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFBPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the MXLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFBPX and MXLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFBPXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.43

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.70

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.26

-0.07

Drawdowns

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFBPX drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum MXLGX drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFBPX and MXLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFBPXMXLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-62.98%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-14.95%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.69%

-20.74%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.50%

-38.07%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-38.07%

-11.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-25.82%

+7.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

4.71%

-3.22%

Volatility

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund (SFBPX) is 2.94%, while Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that SFBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFBPXMXLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.49%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

10.55%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

14.15%

-5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

21.83%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.21%

23.46%

+19.75%

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFBPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than MXLGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFBPX vs. MXLGX - Dividend Comparison

SFBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, less than MXLGX's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
12.16%12.90%9.72%2.95%9.29%21.33%30.57%17.96%25.47%5.25%
SFBPX
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund
8.34%9.06%8.51%5.49%8.61%11.50%12.95%9.17%9.07%5.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFBPX and MXLGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLGX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to SFBPX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFBPX dropped -49.54% vs MXLGX's -62.98%.

SFBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFBPX and MXLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer