MXLGX vs. MXBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX).
MXLGX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on May 21, 2003. MXBPX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Sep 15, 1999.
Performance
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLGX Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.64% | 13.93% | 25.30% | 33.43% | -34.08% | 41.30% | 40.72% | 36.20% | -0.47% | 28.82% |
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | -0.27% | 13.78% | 9.00% | 13.96% | -13.04% | 14.39% | 11.44% | 20.91% | -8.67% | 13.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLGX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than MXBPX's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLGX has outperformed MXBPX with an annualized return of 14.58%, while MXBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.91% annualized return.
MXLGX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
MXBPX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 12.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 6.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXLGX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLGX
MXBPX
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXLGX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.92 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.36 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.36 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 5.32 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXLGX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.92 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.11 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLGX and MXBPX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison
MXLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, more than MXBPX's 5.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLGX Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund | 14.12% | 12.90% | 9.72% | 2.95% | 9.29% | 21.33% | 30.57% | 17.96% | 25.47% | 5.25% |
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 5.94% | 5.92% | 6.18% | 5.45% | 9.89% | 9.76% | 8.52% | 11.28% | 12.07% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLGX drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than MXBPX's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLGX and MXBPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLGX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -55.80% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -9.21% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.07% | -25.51% | -12.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | -28.63% | -9.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -5.34% | -6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -21.11% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 2.35% | +2.54% |
Volatility
MXLGX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 4.26%. This indicates that MXLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXLGX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 4.26% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 8.20% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 13.60% | +7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 13.42% | +8.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 13.67% | +9.75% |