MXLGX vs. ALARX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX).
MXLGX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on May 21, 2003. ALARX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 8, 1993.
Performance
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLGX Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund | -8.64% | 13.93% | 25.30% | 33.43% | -34.08% | 41.30% | 40.72% | 36.20% | -0.47% | 28.82% |
ALARX Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund | -10.15% | 31.75% | 49.44% | 42.82% | -36.88% | 18.38% | 41.50% | 33.13% | -0.82% | 31.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLGX achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly higher than ALARX's -10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLGX has underperformed ALARX with an annualized return of 14.58%, while ALARX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.80% annualized return.
MXLGX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- 1Y
- 10.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
ALARX
- 1D
- 4.97%
- 1M
- -4.89%
- YTD
- -10.15%
- 6M
- -11.34%
- 1Y
- 32.72%
- 3Y*
- 30.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 16.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ALARX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXLGX vs. ALARX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLGX
ALARX
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXLGX | ALARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.25 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.85 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.82 | -1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 6.03 | -3.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXLGX | ALARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.25 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.46 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.47 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLGX and ALARX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Dividend Comparison
MXLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, more than ALARX's 7.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLGX Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund | 14.12% | 12.90% | 9.72% | 2.95% | 9.29% | 21.33% | 30.57% | 17.96% | 25.47% | 5.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALARX Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund | 7.77% | 6.99% | 13.06% | 8.09% | 3.90% | 19.40% | 16.62% | 10.34% | 12.39% | 6.75% | 0.00% | 7.71% |
Drawdowns
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLGX drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, smaller than the maximum ALARX drawdown of -68.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLGX and ALARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLGX | ALARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -68.32% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -18.65% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.07% | -46.86% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | -46.86% | +8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -14.61% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.98% | -21.07% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 5.61% | -0.72% |
Volatility
MXLGX vs. ALARX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) is 6.00%, while Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that MXLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXLGX | ALARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 9.23% | -3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 17.21% | -5.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 27.96% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 27.79% | -5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.42% | 24.70% | -1.28% |