PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFBPX vs. FMUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund (SFBPX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFBPX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly higher than FMUAX's 5.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SFBPX has outperformed FMUAX with an annualized return of 7.28%, while FMUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.95% annualized return.


SFBPX

1D
1.06%
1M
-0.80%
6M
5.00%
YTD
7.46%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
7.28%
ALL TIME*
6.87%

FMUAX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.69%
6M
4.11%
YTD
5.65%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
5.95%
ALL TIME*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SFBPX
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund
7.46%14.49%8.93%13.80%-23.41%22.72%13.37%18.83%-6.02%13.08%
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
5.65%9.00%8.70%9.81%-10.68%10.32%8.48%15.16%-5.24%11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SFBPX and FMUAX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.86

The correlation between SFBPX and FMUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFBPX vs. FMUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SFBPX
SFBPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SFBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SFBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUAX
FMUAX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FMUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund (SFBPX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFBPXFMUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.17

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

15.09

-5.54

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFBPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FMUAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFBPX and FMUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFBPX drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, which is greater than FMUAX's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFBPX and FMUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFBPXFMUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-22.43%

-27.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-4.94%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.69%

-10.18%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.50%

-15.93%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-21.46%

-28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.92%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.10%

-2.74%

-15.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.97%

+0.57%

Volatility

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund (SFBPX) has a higher volatility of 2.49% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) at 1.68%. This indicates that SFBPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFBPXFMUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

1.68%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

4.95%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.34%

6.38%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

7.21%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.20%

8.14%

+35.06%

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFBPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFBPX vs. FMUAX - Dividend Comparison

SFBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.43%, more than FMUAX's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUAX
Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund
1.30%1.23%2.01%2.53%2.25%4.56%2.12%4.00%7.98%2.17%2.36%2.80%
SFBPX
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced ETF Fund
8.43%9.06%8.51%5.49%8.61%11.50%12.95%9.17%9.07%5.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFBPX and FMUAX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFBPX has higher volatility (2.49%) compared to FMUAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFBPX dropped -49.54% vs FMUAX's -22.43%.

FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFBPX and FMUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer