SEZL vs. WPM
SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) and WPM (Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.) are both stocks. SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while WPM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past year, SEZL returned -5.28% vs 29.24% for WPM. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SEZL vs. WPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 109.06% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's -0.90% return.
SEZL
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 29.59%
- YTD
- 109.06%
- 6M
- 88.63%
- 1Y
- -5.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WPM
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -18.24%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- -0.91%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 38.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.71%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
SEZL vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 109.06% | 48.89% | 1,146.59% | -9.40% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | -0.90% | 110.52% | 15.24% | 19.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEZL and WPM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
SEZL:
$4.64B
WPM:
$52.82B
SEZL:
$4.15
WPM:
$3.96
SEZL:
32.00
WPM:
29.33
SEZL:
0.06
WPM:
0.78
SEZL:
9.87
WPM:
19.23
SEZL:
23.56
WPM:
5.70
SEZL:
$480.91M
WPM:
$2.75B
SEZL:
$426.79M
WPM:
$2.12B
SEZL:
$193.18M
WPM:
$2.38B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEZL vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank
SEZL
WPM
SEZL vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEZL | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.84 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.10 | 2.40 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEZL vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and WPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEZL | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.95% | -48.64% | -41.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.02% | -34.92% | -37.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.15% | -29.73% | +2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.29% | -18.87% | -21.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.61% | 12.22% | +41.39% |
Volatility
SEZL vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) have volatilities of 17.41% and 16.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEZL | WPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.41% | 16.76% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.20% | 39.19% | +23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.49% | 45.96% | +41.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 204.57% | 35.44% | +169.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 204.57% | 36.78% | +167.79% |
Dividends
SEZL vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison
SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. | 0.62% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 1.22% | 1.54% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.84% | 1.49% | 1.09% |
Financials
SEZL vs. WPM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sezzle Inc. Common Stock and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SEZL vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison
SEZL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 117.02M and revenue of 135.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.
WPM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.
SEZL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 69.04M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.
WPM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.
SEZL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sezzle Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 51.30M and revenue of 135.54M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
WPM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEZL and WPM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEZL has higher volatility (17.41%) compared to WPM (16.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs WPM's -48.64%.
WPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEZL and WPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer