SEZL vs. LTBR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) and LTBR (Lightbridge Corporation) are both stocks. SEZL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while LTBR operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past year, SEZL returned -5.28% vs -30.88% for LTBR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SEZL vs. LTBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 109.06% return, which is significantly higher than LTBR's -25.63% return.

SEZL

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 29.59%
• YTD: 109.06%
• 6M: 88.63%
• 1Y: -5.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LTBR

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -27.19%
• YTD: -25.63%
• 6M: -39.16%
• 1Y: -30.88%
• 3Y*: 25.90%
• 5Y*: 7.53%
• 10Y*: -7.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEZL vs. LTBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock	109.06%	48.89%	1,146.59%	-9.40%
LTBR Lightbridge Corporation	-25.63%	167.23%	47.35%	-39.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SEZL and LTBR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023	0.27

The correlation between SEZL and LTBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SEZL : $4.64B LTBR : $301.21M
EPS SEZL : $4.15 LTBR : -$0.84
PB Ratio SEZL : 23.56 LTBR : 1.38
Total Revenue (TTM) SEZL : $480.91M LTBR : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) SEZL : $426.79M LTBR : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) SEZL : $193.18M LTBR : -$11.77M

Return for Risk

SEZL vs. LTBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEZL

SEZL Risk / Return Rank: 42
SEZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SEZL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SEZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SEZL Martin Ratio Rank: 40

LTBR

LTBR Risk / Return Rank: 31
LTBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
LTBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
LTBR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LTBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LTBR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEZL vs. LTBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEZL	LTBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	-0.31	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.55	0.17	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.02	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	-0.45	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.10	-0.77	+0.67

SEZL vs. LTBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEZL Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the LTBR Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEZL and LTBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEZL vs. LTBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, smaller than the maximum LTBR drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and LTBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEZL	LTBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.95%	-99.96%	+10.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.02%	-68.54%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-68.54%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-83.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.15%	-99.77%	+72.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.29%	-95.01%	+54.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	53.61%	40.34%	+13.27%

Volatility

SEZL vs. LTBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) is 17.41%, while Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) has a volatility of 26.39%. This indicates that SEZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEZL	LTBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.41%	26.39%	-8.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.20%	61.20%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	87.49%	99.07%	-11.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	204.57%	109.13%	+95.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	204.57%	106.06%	+98.51%

Dividends

SEZL vs. LTBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEZL nor LTBR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEZL and LTBR in my portfolio?

SEZL and LTBR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEZL or LTBR?

LTBR has higher volatility (26.39%) compared to SEZL (17.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs LTBR's -99.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEZL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.