SEZL vs. EDD
SEZL (Sezzle Inc. Common Stock) is a stock, while EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Morgan Stanley. Over the past year, SEZL returned -0.06% vs 27.62% for EDD. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SEZL vs. EDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEZL achieves a 143.80% return, which is significantly higher than EDD's 14.80% return.
SEZL
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -11.66%
- 6M
- 144.70%
- YTD
- 143.80%
- 1Y
- -0.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 251.49%
EDD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.10M | $3.03M | $2.42M | |
| $71.68M | $100.82M | $92.07M |
SEZL vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 143.80% | 48.89% | 1,146.59% | -9.40% |
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 14.80% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEZL and EDD is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEZL vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank
SEZL
EDD
SEZL vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEZL | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 1.57 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.00 | 5.03 | -5.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEZL vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEZL drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, which is greater than EDD's maximum drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEZL and EDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEZL | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.95% | -59.38% | -30.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.53% | -17.67% | -49.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.93% | -2.84% | -15.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.95% | -24.06% | -14.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.40% | 5.50% | +41.90% |
Volatility
SEZL vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison
Sezzle Inc. Common Stock (SEZL) has a higher volatility of 24.29% compared to Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) at 4.62%. This indicates that SEZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEZL | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.29% | 4.62% | +19.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.32% | 13.86% | +51.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.01% | 16.72% | +70.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 200.71% | 15.57% | +185.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 200.71% | 17.66% | +183.05% |
Dividends
SEZL vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison
SEZL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 10.82% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
SEZL Sezzle Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEZL and EDD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEZL has higher volatility (24.29%) compared to EDD (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEZL dropped -89.95% vs EDD's -59.38%.
EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEZL and EDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer