SETH vs. ETCG
SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) and ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SETH tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%) while ETCG tracks the Ethereum Classic (ETC). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SETH returned 27.48% vs -66.90% for ETCG. Their -0.69 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETCG.
Performance
SETH vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SETH achieves a 29.49% return, which is significantly higher than ETCG's -48.20% return.
SETH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -10.05%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 29.49%
- 1Y
- 27.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -31.12%
ETCG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -14.29%
- 6M
- -34.76%
- YTD
- -48.20%
- 1Y
- -66.90%
- 3Y*
- -20.39%
- 5Y*
- -37.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $68.71K | $56.64K | $109.86K | |
| $1.09M | $1.16M | $1.85M |
SETH vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 29.49% | -29.41% | -49.59% | -22.19% |
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -48.20% | -39.78% | -9.57% | 42.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between SETH and ETCG is -0.70, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023 | -0.69 |
The correlation between SETH and ETCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SETH vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank
SETH
ETCG
SETH vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SETH | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.75 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | -0.92 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | -1.31 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SETH vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SETH drawdown since its inception was -80.74%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SETH and ETCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SETH | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.74% | -96.59% | +15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.71% | -72.70% | +42.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -82.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.43% | -96.25% | +31.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.12% | -82.89% | +27.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.71% | 51.27% | -33.56% |
Volatility
SETH vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) has a higher volatility of 12.55% compared to Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG) at 9.53%. This indicates that SETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SETH | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.55% | 9.53% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.56% | 33.34% | +12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.05% | 57.33% | +9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.84% | 90.71% | -21.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.84% | 114.30% | -45.46% |
SETH vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SETH vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison
SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.11%, while ETCG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 22.11% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SETH and ETCG have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SETH has higher volatility (12.55%) compared to ETCG (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SETH dropped -80.74% vs ETCG's -96.59%.
On 1-year performance, SETH leads with 27.48% vs -66.90% for ETCG. On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ETCG has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SETH has performed better with a 27.48% return vs -66.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 22.11%, compared with 0.00% for ETCG.
SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%), while ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SETH and 2.50% for ETCG.
SETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SETH and ETCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer