SENT vs. NLSI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) and NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) are both Long-Short funds. SENT is passively managed, while NLSI is actively managed. SENT charges 1.01%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for NLSI.

Performance

SENT vs. NLSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

NLSI

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. NLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF	7.01%	1.90%

Return for Risk

SENT vs. NLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	NLSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	1.04	-1.29

Drawdowns

SENT vs. NLSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than NLSI's maximum drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and NLSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	NLSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	-13.82%	-16.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-1.33%	-25.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.90%	-6.10%	-14.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SENT	NLSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	19.37%	-19.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	19.37%	-6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	19.37%	-6.05%

SENT vs. NLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSI's 2.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SENT vs. NLSI - Dividend Comparison

SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.

Position	TTM	2025
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF	2.42%	0.46%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, SENT or NLSI?

On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SENT or NLSI?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SENT or NLSI?

NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between SENT and NLSI?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SENT and 2.89% for NLSI.