SENT vs. HFSP

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) and HFSP (TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF) are both Long-Short funds. SENT is passively managed, while HFSP is actively managed. Over the past year, SENT returned 0.00% vs -14.40% for HFSP. SENT charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for HFSP.

Performance

SENT vs. HFSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

HFSP

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: -5.78%
• 6M: -3.69%
• 1Y: -14.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. HFSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	-5.78%	-24.01%	1.15%

Return for Risk

SENT vs. HFSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFSP

HFSP Risk / Return Rank: 3
HFSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HFSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HFSP Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HFSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
HFSP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENT vs. HFSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	HFSP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.75	+0.50

Drawdowns

SENT vs. HFSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, smaller than the maximum HFSP drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and HFSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	HFSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	-33.80%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-24.64%	+24.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-32.10%	+4.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.89%	-16.98%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	13.97%	-13.97%

Volatility

SENT vs. HFSP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF (HFSP) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SENT	HFSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	5.02%	-5.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	12.47%	-12.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	21.03%	-21.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	24.51%	-11.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	24.51%	-11.19%

SENT vs. HFSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSP's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SENT vs. HFSP - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENT nor HFSP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
HFSP TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.53%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, SENT or HFSP?

HFSP has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENT dropped -30.34% vs HFSP's -33.80%.

Which ETF is better, SENT or HFSP?

On 1-year performance, SENT leads with 0.00% vs -14.40% for HFSP. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SENT or HFSP?

Over the 1-year period, SENT has performed better with a 0.00% return vs -14.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SENT or HFSP?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for HFSP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SENT or HFSP?

SENT and HFSP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SENT and HFSP?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and TradersAI. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SENT and 1.25% for HFSP.