SENT vs. EHLS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) and EHLS (Even Herd Long Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. SENT is passively managed, while EHLS is actively managed. Over the past year, SENT returned 0.00% vs 23.69% for EHLS. SENT charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for EHLS.

Performance

SENT vs. EHLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

EHLS

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 2.51%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 16.66%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SENT vs. EHLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	15.59%	6.67%	11.57%

SENT vs. EHLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SENT	EHLS
Technology	26.2%	12.4%
Healthcare	24.8%	9.6%
Industrials	14.6%	13.5%
Energy	10.3%	13.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	4.5%
Financial Services	6.1%	15.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	4.3%
Basic Materials	3.0%	8.3%
Communication Services	1.9%	5.0%
Real Estate	-	5.7%
Utilities	-	7.9%

Return for Risk

SENT vs. EHLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHLS

EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 41
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENT vs. EHLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SENT	EHLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	0.81	-1.06

Drawdowns

SENT vs. EHLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, which is greater than EHLS's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and EHLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SENT	EHLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.34%	-18.96%	-11.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-9.06%	+9.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.23%	-1.54%	-25.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.90%	-4.43%	-16.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	3.08%	-3.08%

Volatility

SENT vs. EHLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SENT	EHLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	5.41%	-5.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	14.54%	-14.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	18.71%	-18.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	19.76%	-7.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.32%	19.76%	-6.44%

SENT vs. EHLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than EHLS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

SENT vs. EHLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SENT nor EHLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.03%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, SENT or EHLS?

EHLS has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENT dropped -30.34% vs EHLS's -18.96%.

Which ETF is better, SENT or EHLS?

On 1-year performance, EHLS leads with 23.69% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SENT or EHLS?

Over the 1-year period, EHLS has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SENT or EHLS?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SENT or EHLS?

SENT and EHLS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SENT and EHLS?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and N/A. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SENT and 1.58% for EHLS.