PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SENT vs. BEDZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SENT vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SENT vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SENT
AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%-6.03%-18.25%2.49%
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
-6.61%3.46%18.31%23.88%-13.40%6.49%

Returns By Period


SENT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-2.90%
5Y*
-4.28%
10Y*

BEDZ

1D
-0.16%
1M
-4.32%
YTD
-6.61%
6M
-5.33%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SENT vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SENT has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SENT vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SENT

BEDZ
BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SENT vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SENT vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SENTBEDZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.22

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between SENT and BEDZ is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SENT vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%.


TTM20252024202320222021
SENT
AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
2.47%2.31%0.00%1.67%0.21%0.36%

Drawdowns

SENT vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SENT drawdown since its inception was -30.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BEDZ drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENT and BEDZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SENTBEDZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.34%

-29.70%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

0.00%

-12.06%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.23%

-10.04%

-17.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-8.26%

-12.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

5.57%

-5.57%

Volatility

SENT vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) is 0.00%, while AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that SENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SENTBEDZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.56%

-6.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.00%

15.40%

-15.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

25.68%

-25.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

24.96%

-11.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

24.96%

-11.42%