PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SEML.L is traded in GBP, while XDEW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDEW.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L has underperformed XDEW.DE with an annualized return of 1.79%, while XDEW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.


SEML.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.91%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.79%

XDEW.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.38%
6M
7.61%
YTD
11.60%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
11.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.87%10.31%-1.20%5.42%-0.23%-9.48%-1.55%8.21%0.03%4.91%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
11.60%4.72%13.48%7.89%-1.84%31.60%6.89%24.44%-3.19%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SEML.L and XDEW.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.37

The correlation between SEML.L and XDEW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (5 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEW.DE
XDEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEML.LXDEW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

3.26

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

10.38

-6.51

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the XDEW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEML.L and XDEW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -46.67%, which is greater than XDEW.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and XDEW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEML.LXDEW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.67%

-31.95%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.78%

-5.46%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.78%

-20.98%

+16.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.11%

-20.98%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.24%

-31.95%

+10.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

-1.44%

-11.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.70%

-4.19%

-22.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.72%

0.00%

Volatility

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) is 1.36%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that SEML.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEML.LXDEW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

3.01%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

6.88%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.73%

10.07%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

14.51%

-7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.26%

16.39%

-7.13%

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEML.L vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison

SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while XDEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
5.65%5.44%5.55%5.05%5.25%4.58%5.13%5.44%7.30%6.75%6.78%5.18%
XDEW.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEML.L and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

SEML.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SEML.L and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEML.L and XDEW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer