SEML.L vs. SEMB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L).
SEML.L and SEMB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEML.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. SEMB.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Feb 15, 2008. Both SEML.L and SEMB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SEML.L or SEMB.L.
Correlation
The correlation between SEML.L and SEMB.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SEML.L:
0.52
SEMB.L:
0.83
SEML.L:
0.81
SEMB.L:
1.27
SEML.L:
1.09
SEMB.L:
1.14
SEML.L:
0.20
SEMB.L:
1.00
SEML.L:
1.90
SEMB.L:
4.67
SEML.L:
1.64%
SEMB.L:
1.22%
SEML.L:
6.03%
SEMB.L:
6.88%
SEML.L:
-32.09%
SEMB.L:
-21.74%
SEML.L:
-10.36%
SEMB.L:
-2.73%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than SEMB.L's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SEML.L has underperformed SEMB.L with an annualized return of 2.00%, while SEMB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.98% annualized return.
SEML.L
2.36%
-0.71%
2.59%
3.11%
-0.90%
2.00%
SEMB.L
0.24%
-1.61%
2.98%
5.71%
0.50%
5.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SEML.L
SEMB.L
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L - Dividend Comparison
SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.84%, more than SEMB.L's 2.62% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 5.84% | 5.56% | 5.06% | 5.25% | 4.58% | 5.13% | 5.44% | 5.46% | 5.38% | 4.89% | 3.29% | 5.87% |
SEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.62% | 3.86% | 7.21% | 6.70% | 5.35% | 5.28% | 6.25% | 6.15% | 6.48% | 6.88% | 7.10% | 7.29% |
Drawdowns
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, which is greater than SEMB.L's maximum drawdown of -21.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and SEMB.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SEML.L vs. SEMB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) at 1.41%. This indicates that SEML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.