PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEML.L vs. TP05.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
-2.90%4.32%-6.40%0.23%-5.32%-13.17%-6.26%2.59%-6.78%-1.66%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.17%-1.30%6.56%-1.34%8.77%6.75%1.37%1.64%6.35%-3.56%
Different Trading Currencies

SEML.L is traded in GBP, while TP05.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TP05.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEML.L achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than TP05.L's 2.17% return.


SEML.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
0.20%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
-1.49%
5Y*
-2.80%
10Y*
-2.71%

TP05.L

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.52%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.49%
1Y
0.78%
3Y*
2.18%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEML.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TP05.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEML.L vs. TP05.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEML.LTP05.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.11

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.68

0.21

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.02

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

0.17

+0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.21

0.32

+1.90

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEML.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the TP05.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEML.L and TP05.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEML.LTP05.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.11

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.53

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.35

-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between SEML.L and TP05.L is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Dividend Comparison

SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TP05.L's 5.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.03%0.05%0.06%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.03%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.92%6.05%6.89%5.27%0.34%0.35%3.26%3.36%2.92%1.05%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEML.L drawdown since its inception was -66.68%, which is greater than TP05.L's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEML.L and TP05.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEML.LTP05.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.68%

-15.95%

-50.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-6.66%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

-15.95%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.96%

-4.67%

-60.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.29%

-6.31%

-47.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

3.57%

-1.81%

Volatility

SEML.L vs. TP05.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) at 2.28%. This indicates that SEML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TP05.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEML.LTP05.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.28%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.01%

4.45%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

6.85%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.36%

8.07%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.17%

8.60%

+1.57%