PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEMGX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMGX achieves a 24.51% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 12.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SEMGX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 7.90%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.76% annualized return.


SEMGX

1D
1.96%
1M
-5.34%
6M
14.66%
YTD
24.51%
1Y
42.90%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
7.90%
ALL TIME*
5.24%

COBYX

1D
0.87%
1M
1.65%
6M
5.16%
YTD
12.33%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
4.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
24.51%28.85%7.48%6.32%-21.66%-11.60%18.65%19.23%-12.25%37.71%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
12.33%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMGX and COBYX is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between SEMGX and COBYX has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEMGX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEMGX
SEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEMGXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.46

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

8.33

-0.13

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMGX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMGX drawdown since its inception was -67.21%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMGX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEMGXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.21%

-34.18%

-33.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.84%

-8.95%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.37%

-16.29%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.63%

-17.10%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

-34.18%

-11.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.68%

0.00%

-9.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.15%

-6.73%

-18.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

2.63%

+2.67%

Volatility

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SEMGX) has a higher volatility of 11.89% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.13%. This indicates that SEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEMGXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.89%

3.13%

+8.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.41%

9.78%

+13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.76%

11.74%

+14.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

13.96%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

13.68%

+5.26%

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMGX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEMGX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

SEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than COBYX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.05%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%
SEMGX
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.41%3.00%0.15%2.16%2.16%1.71%1.23%1.94%0.71%0.62%0.54%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEMGX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEMGX has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to COBYX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMGX dropped -67.21% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

COBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEMGX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer