SEMG vs. AMJB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SEMG (Suncoast Select Growth ETF) and AMJB (Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SEMG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Suncoast, while AMJB is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. SEMG is actively managed, while AMJB is passively managed. Over the past year, SEMG returned 3.68% vs 15.68% for AMJB. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. SEMG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for AMJB.

Performance

SEMG vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEMG achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than AMJB's 17.69% return.

SEMG

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: -2.89%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMJB

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -1.98%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 6M: 15.52%
• 1Y: 15.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEMG vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	-2.89%	8.27%
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	17.69%	-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SEMG and AMJB is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

SEMG vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEMG

SEMG Risk / Return Rank: 13
SEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
SEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 13

AMJB

AMJB Risk / Return Rank: 30
AMJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
AMJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
AMJB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
AMJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
AMJB Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEMG vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEMG	AMJB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	1.03	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	1.52	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.18	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	1.60	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.75	4.73	-3.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEMG vs. AMJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEMG Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the AMJB Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEMG and AMJB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEMG	AMJB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	1.03	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.70	-0.32

Drawdowns

SEMG vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEMG drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, smaller than the maximum AMJB drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEMG and AMJB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEMG	AMJB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-17.70%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-9.90%	-5.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.86%	-6.06%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-4.98%	+1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	3.34%	+1.59%

Volatility

SEMG vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Suncoast Select Growth ETF (SEMG) is 3.14%, while Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that SEMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEMG	AMJB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	5.66%	-2.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	12.18%	-2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.04%	15.37%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.00%	18.19%	-5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.00%	18.19%	-5.19%

SEMG vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEMG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEMG vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison

SEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while AMJB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%
SEMG Suncoast Select Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEMG and AMJB in my portfolio?

SEMG and AMJB have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEMG or AMJB?

AMJB has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to SEMG (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEMG dropped -15.80% vs AMJB's -17.70%.

Which ETF is better, SEMG or AMJB?

On 1-year performance, AMJB leads with 15.68% vs 3.68% for SEMG. On fees, SEMG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SEMG has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEMG or AMJB?

Over the 1-year period, AMJB has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 3.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEMG or AMJB?

SEMG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for AMJB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEMG or AMJB?

SEMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for AMJB.

What is the main difference between SEMG and AMJB?

SEMG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AMJB is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Suncoast and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SEMG and 0.85% for AMJB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMJB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.