SEIV vs. OILK
SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. SEIV is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIV returned 27.80%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
SEIV vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIV achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
SEIV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 6M
- 21.23%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 27.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SEIV vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 18.28% | 27.43% | 19.73% | 21.90% | -3.71% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | -11.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIV and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.10 |
The correlation between SEIV and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEIV vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEIV
OILK
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
SEIV
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEIV
OILK
Healthcare
SEIV
OILK
-
Technology
SEIV
OILK
-
Communication Services
SEIV
OILK
-
Basic Materials
SEIV
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
SEIV
OILK
-
Industrials
SEIV
OILK
-
Utilities
SEIV
OILK
-
Real Estate
SEIV
OILK
-
Energy
SEIV
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIV vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
SEIV
OILK
SEIV vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.34 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.47 | 3.42 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.41 | 6.91 | +19.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60 | 2.06 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.23 | 0.12 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
SEIV vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -83.76% | +65.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -17.35% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.71% | -23.42% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -3.66% | +2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -32.61% | +29.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 8.56% | -6.86% |
Volatility
SEIV vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) is 4.10%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that SEIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIV | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 10.44% | -6.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.08% | 23.26% | -14.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 28.75% | -16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 30.12% | -13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 35.97% | -19.29% |
SEIV vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIV vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.34% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIV and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SEIV (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIV dropped -18.18% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 27.80% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.34% for SEIV.
SEIV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: SEI and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.68% for OILK.
SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEIV and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer