PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEIV vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEIV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIV achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 7.75% return.


SEIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
10.69%
YTD
18.28%
6M
21.23%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
10Y*

ILCV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.76%
YTD
7.75%
6M
7.41%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
11.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
18.28%27.43%19.73%21.90%-3.71%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
7.75%18.79%17.03%14.43%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIV and ILCV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.92

The correlation between SEIV and ILCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SEIV
ILCV

Financial Services

23.0%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

18.5%
9.5%

Healthcare

18.1%
11.5%

Technology

17.0%
23.8%

Communication Services

6.5%
8.0%

Basic Materials

5.1%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
7.6%

Industrials

3.0%
8.8%

Utilities

2.4%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.0%

Energy

0.9%
6.0%

Financial Services

SEIV
23.0%
ILCV
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SEIV
18.5%
ILCV
9.5%

Healthcare

SEIV
18.1%
ILCV
11.5%

Technology

SEIV
17.0%
ILCV
23.8%

Communication Services

SEIV
6.5%
ILCV
8.0%

Basic Materials

SEIV
5.1%
ILCV
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

SEIV
3.9%
ILCV
7.6%

Industrials

SEIV
3.0%
ILCV
8.8%

Utilities

SEIV
2.4%
ILCV
3.5%

Real Estate

SEIV
1.2%
ILCV
2.0%

Energy

SEIV
0.9%
ILCV
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEIV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIV
SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEIVILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.50

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

4.08

+2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.41

16.87

+9.54

SEIV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIV Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEIVILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

2.72

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.23

0.46

+0.77

Drawdowns

SEIV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEIVILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-58.63%

+40.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-6.55%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

-14.95%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.60%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-9.32%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.58%

+0.12%

Volatility

SEIV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.01%. This indicates that SEIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEIVILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

2.01%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

6.97%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

9.82%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

14.21%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

16.66%

+0.02%

SEIV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SEIV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than ILCV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.63%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.34%1.51%1.66%2.08%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEIV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to ILCV (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIV dropped -18.18% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 27.80% vs 18.61% for ILCV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 18.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SEIV.

ILCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.34% for SEIV.

They also come from different issuers: SEI and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.04% for ILCV.

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEIV and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer