SEIV vs. FELV

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) and FELV (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SEIV returned 37.39% vs 32.28% for FELV. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEIV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELV.

Performance

SEIV vs. FELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEIV achieves a 17.61% return, which is significantly lower than FELV's 20.10% return.

SEIV

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 15.75%
• YTD: 17.61%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 24.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FELV

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 2.98%
• 6M: 16.57%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEIV vs. FELV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF	17.61%	27.43%	19.73%	7.94%
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	20.10%	15.80%	15.89%	7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIV and FELV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023	0.88

The correlation between SEIV and FELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIV vs. FELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEIV	FELV
Technology	37.6%	21.0%
Financial Services	14.0%	18.6%
Communication Services	10.5%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	7.7%
Healthcare	9.9%	10.3%
Utilities	6.0%	3.3%
Industrials	3.7%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.7%
Energy	2.5%	5.8%
Basic Materials	1.6%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.3%	3.1%

Return for Risk

SEIV vs. FELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 94
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FELV

FELV Risk / Return Rank: 94
FELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FELV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FELV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEIV vs. FELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIV	FELV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	2.92	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	4.04	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.53	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	4.73	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.96	20.41	-0.45

SEIV vs. FELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is comparable to the FELV Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIV and FELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEIV vs. FELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIV drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, which is greater than FELV's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIV and FELV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIV	FELV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.18%	-16.08%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-6.85%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	0.00%	-1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-2.00%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	1.59%	+0.29%

Volatility

SEIV vs. FELV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) is 2.53%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that SEIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIV	FELV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.53%	2.79%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.49%	8.52%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	11.10%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	13.38%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	13.38%	+3.19%

SEIV vs. FELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FELV's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SEIV vs. FELV - Dividend Comparison

SEIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than FELV's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	1.44%	1.67%	2.02%	0.04%	0.00%
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF	1.47%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIV and FELV in my portfolio?

SEIV and FELV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEIV or FELV?

FELV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to SEIV (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIV dropped -18.18% vs FELV's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, SEIV or FELV?

On 1-year performance, SEIV leads with 37.39% vs 32.28% for FELV. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEIV or FELV?

Over the 1-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 37.39% return vs 32.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIV or FELV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIV or FELV?

SEIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.44% for FELV.

What is the main difference between SEIV and FELV?

They also come from different issuers: SEI and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIV and 0.18% for FELV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.