PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FELV vs. MGV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FELVMGV
YTD Return9.12%10.42%
Daily Std Dev9.71%9.70%
Max Drawdown-5.34%-56.31%
Current Drawdown-0.58%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between FELV and MGV is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FELV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FELV achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 10.42% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.97%
17.06%
FELV
MGV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF

Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF

FELV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FELV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
Expense ratio chart for FELV: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%
Expense ratio chart for MGV: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FELV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FELV
Sharpe ratio
No data
MGV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MGV, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MGV, currently valued at 3.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.36
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MGV, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MGV, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MGV, currently valued at 8.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.008.22

FELV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FELV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

FELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than MGV's 2.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FELV
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
0.94%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
2.34%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%2.26%2.29%

Drawdowns

FELV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELV drawdown since its inception was -5.34%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELV and MGV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.58%
0
FELV
MGV

Volatility

FELV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) have volatilities of 2.41% and 2.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.41%
2.41%
FELV
MGV