SEIQ vs. OUSA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) and OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. SEIQ is actively managed, while OUSA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIQ returned 13.11%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for OUSA. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SEIQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSA.

Performance

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SEIQ having a 6.22% return and OUSA slightly higher at 6.53%.

SEIQ

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.35%
• 6M: 6.00%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 1Y: 13.02%
• 3Y*: 13.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.90%

OUSA

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.87%
• 6M: 4.63%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 1Y: 15.60%
• 3Y*: 12.64%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: 10.36%
• ALL TIME*: 10.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	$914.72K	$1.31M	$1.45M
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	$2.13M	$3.08M	$2.14M

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	6.22%	12.51%	16.15%	22.66%	1.51%
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	6.53%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SEIQ and OUSA is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.88

The correlation between SEIQ and OUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SEIQ	OUSA
Technology	34.1%	23.7%
Healthcare	19.4%	15.1%
Consumer Defensive	13.1%	7.4%
Financial Services	10.3%	18.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	13.1%
Industrials	6.7%	11.9%
Communication Services	5.3%	10.3%
Basic Materials	0.9%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SEIQ vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 38
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 59
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SEIQ	OUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.46	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.22	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.26	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	1.78	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	6.23	-1.71

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEIQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEIQ and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and OUSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEIQ	OUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-33.12%	+18.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.66%	-8.36%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-13.14%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.75%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-3.50%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.39%	+0.16%

Volatility

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEIQ	OUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	4.00%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.29%	8.11%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.57%	10.27%	+1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.58%	13.38%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.58%	15.19%	-0.61%

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEIQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEIQ vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than OUSA's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.36%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	0.90%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEIQ and OUSA in my portfolio?

SEIQ and OUSA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEIQ or OUSA?

SEIQ has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to OUSA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIQ dropped -14.87% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

Which ETF is better, SEIQ or OUSA?

On 3-year performance, SEIQ leads with 13.11% vs 12.64% for OUSA. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SEIQ or OUSA?

Over the 3-year period, SEIQ has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SEIQ or OUSA?

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SEIQ or OUSA?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.90% for SEIQ.

What is the main difference between SEIQ and OUSA?

They also come from different issuers: SEI and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIQ and 0.48% for OUSA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.