SEIQ vs. DGRS
SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) and DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. SEIQ is actively managed, while DGRS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEIQ returned 13.11%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for DGRS. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SEIQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DGRS.
Performance
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEIQ achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly lower than DGRS's 21.67% return.
SEIQ
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 13.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.90%
DGRS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 31.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.61M | $2.32M | $1.84M | |
| $2.13M | $3.08M | $2.14M |
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF | 6.22% | 12.51% | 16.15% | 22.66% | 1.51% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 21.67% | -0.43% | 10.40% | 21.16% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEIQ and DGRS is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SEIQ and DGRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEIQ
DGRS
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SEIQ
DGRS
Healthcare
SEIQ
DGRS
Consumer Defensive
SEIQ
DGRS
Financial Services
SEIQ
DGRS
Consumer Cyclical
SEIQ
DGRS
Industrials
SEIQ
DGRS
Communication Services
SEIQ
DGRS
Basic Materials
SEIQ
DGRS
Energy
SEIQ
-
DGRS
Real Estate
SEIQ
-
DGRS
Utilities
SEIQ
-
DGRS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEIQ vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank
SEIQ
DGRS
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEIQ | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.30 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 2.98 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 9.53 | -5.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEIQ drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum DGRS drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEIQ and DGRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEIQ | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -44.83% | +29.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -9.68% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -27.57% | +13.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -1.24% | +0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -6.66% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.03% | -0.48% |
Volatility
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) at 3.72%. This indicates that SEIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEIQ | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 3.72% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 10.52% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.57% | 17.17% | -5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 20.22% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 23.57% | -8.99% |
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEIQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEIQ vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison
SEIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DGRS's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.04% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF | 0.90% | 0.94% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEIQ and DGRS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIQ has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to DGRS (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEIQ dropped -14.87% vs DGRS's -44.83%.
On 3-year performance, SEIQ leads with 13.11% vs 12.75% for DGRS. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DGRS has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIQ has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DGRS.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.90% for SEIQ.
They also come from different issuers: SEI and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SEIQ and 0.38% for DGRS.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEIQ and DGRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer