SEF vs. QCMD
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and QCMD (Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for QCMD.
Performance
SEF vs. QCMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than QCMD's -37.78% return.
SEF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- -10.66%
- 5Y*
- -5.46%
- 10Y*
- -11.60%
QCMD
- 1D
- -5.39%
- 1M
- -32.32%
- YTD
- -37.78%
- 6M
- -38.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF vs. QCMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 7.71% | -4.21% |
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | -37.78% | -11.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and QCMD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. QCMD — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
QCMD
SEF vs. QCMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares (QCMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | QCMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.16 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | QCMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -1.01 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. QCMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than QCMD's maximum drawdown of -55.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and QCMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | QCMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -55.59% | -40.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.13% | -54.28% | -41.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.71% | -12.96% | -69.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | — | — |
Volatility
SEF vs. QCMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | QCMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 47.23% | -32.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 47.23% | -29.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 47.23% | -26.71% |
SEF vs. QCMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QCMD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. QCMD - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than QCMD's 3.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCMD Direxion Daily QCOM Bear 1X Shares | 3.82% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.38% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and QCMD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QCMD.
QCMD has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 3.38% for SEF.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 1.00% for QCMD.
Find the right allocation for SEF and QCMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer