SEF vs. PLTZ
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SEF is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.
Performance
SEF vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZ's 4.28% return.
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
PLTZ
- 1D
- 13.03%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -4.39% |
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 4.28% | -64.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and PLTZ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
PLTZ
SEF vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.62 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and PLTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -70.28% | -26.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.09% | -62.87% | -33.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.72% | -52.02% | -30.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility
SEF vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | PLTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 101.99% | -87.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 101.99% | -84.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 101.99% | -81.47% |
SEF vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 1.29% for PLTZ.
Find the right allocation for SEF and PLTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer