SEF vs. DTD
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SEF is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while DTD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.45%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for DTD. At a correlation of -0.86, they often move in opposite directions. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DTD.
Performance
SEF vs. DTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly lower than DTD's 10.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed DTD with an annualized return of -12.45%, while DTD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- -2.58%
- 3Y*
- -12.09%
- 5Y*
- -6.78%
- 10Y*
- -12.45%
DTD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
SEF vs. DTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 2.80% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 10.39% | 14.25% | 18.56% | 10.63% | -3.83% | 26.26% | 2.45% | 28.19% | -6.47% | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and DTD is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2008 | -0.86 |
The correlation between SEF and DTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEF vs. DTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
DTD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SEF
DTD
Basic Materials
SEF
-
DTD
Communication Services
SEF
-
DTD
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
DTD
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
DTD
Energy
SEF
-
DTD
Healthcare
SEF
-
DTD
Industrials
SEF
-
DTD
Real Estate
SEF
-
DTD
Technology
SEF
-
DTD
Utilities
SEF
-
DTD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. DTD — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
DTD
SEF vs. DTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.39 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 14.00 | -14.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. DTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than DTD's maximum drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and DTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -58.19% | -38.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -6.30% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -14.41% | -24.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | -16.14% | -25.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -37.29% | -38.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.31% | -0.92% | -95.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.74% | -7.32% | -75.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 1.52% | +3.29% |
Volatility
SEF vs. DTD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Financials (SEF) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) at 2.65%. This indicates that SEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | DTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 2.65% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 7.13% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 9.41% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 13.56% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 16.19% | +4.29% |
SEF vs. DTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DTD's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. DTD - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than DTD's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund | 1.86% | 1.99% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 2.62% | 2.04% | 2.73% | 2.50% | 2.93% | 2.36% | 2.66% | 2.81% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.54% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and DTD have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEF has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to DTD (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs DTD's -58.19%.
On 10-year performance, DTD leads with 12.37% vs -12.45% for SEF. On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.37% return vs -12.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SEF.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 1.86% for DTD.
SEF is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DTD is Large Cap Value Equities. SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 0.28% for DTD.
DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and DTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer