SEF vs. DOG
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEF returned -12.32%/yr vs -11.32%/yr for DOG. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SEF vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a -4.10% return, which is significantly higher than DOG's -9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SEF has underperformed DOG with an annualized return of -12.32%, while DOG has yielded a comparatively higher -11.32% annualized return.
SEF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.85%
- 6M
- -5.95%
- YTD
- -4.10%
- 1Y
- -8.19%
- 3Y*
- -12.48%
- 5Y*
- -7.31%
- 10Y*
- -12.32%
- ALL TIME*
- -13.95%
DOG
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -9.94%
- 1Y
- -15.77%
- 3Y*
- -9.42%
- 5Y*
- -6.15%
- 10Y*
- -11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $46.08M | $39.92M | $42.43M | |
| $337.72K | $218.20K | $226.34K |
SEF vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | -4.10% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 11.85% | -27.02% | -16.93% | -23.51% | 10.34% | -17.12% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -9.94% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and DOG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2008 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SEF and DOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SEF vs. DOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SEF
DOG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SEF
DOG
Basic Materials
SEF
-
DOG
-
Communication Services
SEF
-
DOG
-
Consumer Cyclical
SEF
-
DOG
-
Consumer Defensive
SEF
-
DOG
-
Energy
SEF
-
DOG
-
Healthcare
SEF
-
DOG
-
Industrials
SEF
-
DOG
-
Real Estate
SEF
-
DOG
-
Technology
SEF
-
DOG
-
Utilities
SEF
-
DOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
DOG
SEF vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEF | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.81 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | -0.98 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.95 | +0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEF vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.56%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -93.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.56% | -93.05% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.57% | -16.13% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.19% | -32.32% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.39% | -37.28% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.42% | -70.70% | -2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.56% | -93.05% | -3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.83% | -66.60% | -16.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 8.11% | -1.47% |
Volatility
SEF vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 3.81%, while ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 4.20% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 10.11% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.53% | 12.59% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 14.86% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.45% | 17.50% | +2.95% |
SEF vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SEF and DOG have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SEF vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, which matches DOG's 3.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.50% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.50% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and DOG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOG has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to SEF (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.56% vs DOG's -93.05%.
On 10-year performance, DOG leads with -11.32% vs -12.32% for SEF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DOG has performed better with a -11.32% return vs -12.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF and DOG have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SEF and DOG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.50%.
SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%).
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer