SEF vs. AMZD
SEF (ProShares Short Financials) and AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%) while AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEF returned -10.34%/yr vs -22.66%/yr for AMZD. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEF charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for AMZD.
Performance
SEF vs. AMZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEF achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than AMZD's -8.90% return.
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
AMZD
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- -8.90%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- -19.87%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF vs. AMZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | -0.38% |
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -8.90% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -46.50% | 45.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEF and AMZD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEF vs. AMZD — Risk / Return Rank
SEF
AMZD
SEF vs. AMZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEF | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | -0.66 | +0.92 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | -0.80 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.90 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | -0.71 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | -1.54 | +2.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEF | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | -0.66 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | -0.59 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SEF vs. AMZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEF drawdown since its inception was -96.51%, which is greater than AMZD's maximum drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEF and AMZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEF | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.51% | -73.05% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -28.27% | +18.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.40% | -59.20% | +19.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.09% | -70.36% | -25.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.72% | -49.11% | -33.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 13.24% | -8.10% |
Volatility
SEF vs. AMZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Financials (SEF) is 3.01%, while Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that SEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEF | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 7.23% | -4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 20.49% | -9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 30.15% | -15.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 33.41% | -15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 33.41% | -12.89% |
SEF vs. AMZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZD's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEF vs. AMZD - Dividend Comparison
SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than AMZD's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.44% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEF and AMZD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZD has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEF dropped -96.51% vs AMZD's -73.05%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.34% vs -22.66% for AMZD. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.34% return vs -22.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.
SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%), while AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SEF and 1.09% for AMZD.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEF and AMZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer