SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L
SEDY.L (iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF) and EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L returned 8.20%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for EMIM.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEDY.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EMIM.L.
Performance
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEDY.L achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than EMIM.L's 24.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L has underperformed EMIM.L with an annualized return of 8.20%, while EMIM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
SEDY.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
EMIM.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 24.23%
- 6M
- 26.48%
- 1Y
- 50.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 10.72% | 18.69% | 8.71% | 13.01% | -22.64% | 12.64% | -5.85% | 10.44% | 0.26% | 14.72% |
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.23% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | 0.74% | 14.91% | 12.69% | -9.32% | 24.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEDY.L and EMIM.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SEDY.L and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank
SEDY.L
EMIM.L
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEDY.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.57 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 4.63 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.57 | 16.57 | -0.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEDY.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 3.04 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.62 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEDY.L drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDY.L and EMIM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEDY.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -31.70% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -10.92% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -15.56% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.66% | -21.98% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.39% | -26.46% | -3.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -2.39% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -8.71% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 3.06% | -1.20% |
Volatility
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) is 4.19%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a volatility of 7.03%. This indicates that SEDY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEDY.L | EMIM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 7.03% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 14.14% | -5.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.43% | 16.67% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 15.82% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 17.81% | -1.59% |
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEDY.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEDY.L vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison
SEDY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, while EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 5.28% | 5.72% | 7.74% | 7.98% | 9.33% | 6.41% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.08% | 4.25% | 6.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEDY.L and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SEDY.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SEDY.L and 0.18% for EMIM.L.
Find the right allocation for SEDY.L and EMIM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer