SEDY.L vs. SEML.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L).
SEDY.L and SEML.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SEDY.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 25, 2011. SEML.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. Both SEDY.L and SEML.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SEDY.L or SEML.L.
Correlation
The correlation between SEDY.L and SEML.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SEDY.L:
0.19
SEML.L:
0.48
SEDY.L:
0.36
SEML.L:
0.75
SEDY.L:
1.04
SEML.L:
1.08
SEDY.L:
0.06
SEML.L:
0.19
SEDY.L:
0.34
SEML.L:
1.76
SEDY.L:
7.78%
SEML.L:
1.64%
SEDY.L:
14.17%
SEML.L:
6.04%
SEDY.L:
-50.85%
SEML.L:
-32.09%
SEDY.L:
-40.73%
SEML.L:
-10.04%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SEDY.L having a 2.85% return and SEML.L slightly lower at 2.73%. Over the past 10 years, SEDY.L has underperformed SEML.L with an annualized return of -2.41%, while SEML.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.97% annualized return.
SEDY.L
2.85%
0.19%
2.65%
2.67%
-5.87%
-2.41%
SEML.L
2.73%
0.10%
1.86%
2.88%
-0.97%
1.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEDY.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SEDY.L
SEML.L
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison
SEDY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEDY.L iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.95% | 9.33% | 6.42% | 5.11% | 5.84% | 5.54% | 4.08% | 4.25% | 6.31% | 4.81% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 5.82% | 5.56% | 5.06% | 5.25% | 4.58% | 5.13% | 5.44% | 5.46% | 5.38% | 4.89% | 3.29% | 5.87% |
Drawdowns
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEDY.L drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, which is greater than SEML.L's maximum drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDY.L and SEML.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SEDY.L vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend UCITS ETF (SEDY.L) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) at 1.99%. This indicates that SEDY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.