PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECU vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SECU vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SECU

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SECU vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SECU and TLT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SECU vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECU

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECU vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SECU vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECUTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.26

+0.89

Drawdowns

SECU vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECU drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECU and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SECUTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-48.35%

+46.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-40.44%

+40.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-13.82%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

Volatility

SECU vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SECUTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

9.77%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

15.87%

-12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.34%

14.91%

-11.57%

SECU vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SECU vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

SECU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECU
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF
2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SECU and TLT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SECU.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.10% for SECU.

SECU is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while TLT is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SECU and 0.15% for TLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SECU and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer