PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SECT vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SECT vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SECT vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SECT
Main Sector Rotation ETF
-6.08%17.80%18.61%21.10%0.90%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
6.82%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SECT achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly lower than THLV's 6.82% return.


SECT

1D
3.00%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-3.67%
1Y
19.09%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*

THLV

1D
1.01%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
6.82%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SECT vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SECT has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SECT vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SECT
SECT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SECT vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SECTTHLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.79

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

2.50

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

3.15

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.37

11.39

-5.02

SECT vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SECT Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SECT and THLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SECTTHLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.79

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.86

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between SECT and THLV is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SECT vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

SECT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than THLV's 1.66% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SECT
Main Sector Rotation ETF
0.71%0.32%0.45%0.84%0.86%0.60%1.37%0.77%1.67%0.50%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.66%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SECT vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SECT drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SECT and THLV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SECTTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.09%

-13.15%

-24.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-6.66%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.03%

-4.37%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-3.75%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.84%

+1.17%

Volatility

SECT vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) at 3.55%. This indicates that SECT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SECTTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

3.55%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

7.61%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

11.31%

+8.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

11.80%

+6.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

11.80%

+8.45%