PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEC0.DE achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.


SEC0.DE

1D
-2.85%
1M
23.18%
YTD
98.10%
6M
100.19%
1Y
192.28%
3Y*
56.37%
5Y*
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
-1.45%
1M
5.25%
YTD
25.82%
6M
27.45%
1Y
46.76%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SEC0.DE
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
98.10%36.46%20.85%61.01%-32.22%21.11%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
25.82%17.14%13.87%7.20%-14.09%0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SEC0.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021

0.65

The correlation between SEC0.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEC0.DE
SEC0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEC0.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.49

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.81

4.42

+10.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

52.61

16.00

+36.61

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.89, which is higher than the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEC0.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEC0.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.89

2.69

+3.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.44

+0.73

Drawdowns

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEC0.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.35%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEC0.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEC0.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.35%

-35.06%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-10.52%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.35%

-19.17%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-2.49%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-9.30%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

2.91%

+0.73%

Volatility

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) at 7.16%. This indicates that SEC0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEC0.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

7.16%

+5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.14%

14.69%

+10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.42%

17.32%

+15.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.95%

16.19%

+13.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.95%

18.04%

+11.91%

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEC0.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEC0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SEC0.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SEC0.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEC0.DE.

SEC0.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SEC0.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEC0.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer