SEACX vs. LCCMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SEACX (Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund) and LCCMX (Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, SEACX returned 1.12%/yr vs 4.25%/yr for LCCMX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SEACX charges 0.72%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LCCMX.

Performance

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEACX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than LCCMX's 3.76% return. Over the past 10 years, SEACX has underperformed LCCMX with an annualized return of 1.12%, while LCCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.25% annualized return.

SEACX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -0.19%
• 6M: -0.10%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 3.73%
• 5Y*: 0.09%
• 10Y*: 1.12%

LCCMX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 6M: 6.46%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 14.61%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	-0.19%	6.50%	1.43%	5.54%	-11.55%	-2.01%	4.97%	6.96%	-0.12%	2.24%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	3.76%	9.73%	18.51%	13.73%	-13.30%	1.30%	7.52%	0.65%	2.35%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SEACX and LCCMX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2005	0.16

The correlation between SEACX and LCCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SEACX vs. LCCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEACX

SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 19
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

LCCMX

LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 74
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SEACX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	2.42	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	5.29	-3.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.99	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	2.92	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.85	10.29	-5.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the LCCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEACX and LCCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SEACX	LCCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	2.42	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	1.04	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.67	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.81	-0.15

Drawdowns

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEACX drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum LCCMX drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEACX and LCCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SEACX	LCCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.96%	-24.57%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-3.76%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.90%	-3.76%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.34%	-19.20%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.96%	-24.57%	+7.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-0.12%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-2.79%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	1.06%	-0.14%

Volatility

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) at 0.70%. This indicates that SEACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SEACX	LCCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	0.70%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.61%	4.07%	-1.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.71%	4.53%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.85%	5.84%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.90%	6.35%	-2.45%

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEACX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than LCCMX's 2.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

SEACX vs. LCCMX - Dividend Comparison

SEACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than LCCMX's 8.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	8.54%	8.93%	10.39%	8.55%	5.68%	2.11%	2.11%	2.98%	2.89%	2.10%	2.01%	2.75%
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	3.35%	2.72%	2.78%	2.06%	1.67%	1.41%	1.86%	2.26%	2.22%	1.98%	2.18%	2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SEACX and LCCMX in my portfolio?

SEACX and LCCMX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SEACX or LCCMX?

SEACX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to LCCMX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEACX dropped -16.96% vs LCCMX's -24.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.