LCCMX vs. FAFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A (FAFAX).
LCCMX is managed by LEADER. It was launched on Jul 14, 2005. FAFAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 24, 2003.
Performance
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | -2.35% | 9.73% | 18.51% | 13.73% | -13.30% | 1.30% | 7.52% | 0.65% | 2.35% | 1.89% |
FAFAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A | -0.68% | 9.76% | 4.04% | 7.83% | -11.67% | 2.92% | 8.46% | 10.85% | -2.03% | 7.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCCMX achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FAFAX's -0.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCCMX having a 3.75% annualized return and FAFAX not far ahead at 3.77%.
LCCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
FAFAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCCMX has a 2.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FAFAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCCMX vs. FAFAX — Risk / Return Rank
LCCMX
FAFAX
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A (FAFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCCMX | FAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 1.97 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.28 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.84 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.71 | 7.65 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCCMX | FAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.43 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.43 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.83 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.77 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCCMX and FAFAX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Dividend Comparison
LCCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, more than FAFAX's 3.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund | 8.33% | 8.93% | 10.39% | 8.55% | 5.68% | 2.11% | 2.11% | 2.98% | 2.89% | 2.10% | 2.01% | 2.75% |
FAFAX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A | 3.01% | 2.93% | 2.88% | 2.66% | 5.70% | 5.06% | 3.60% | 3.52% | 5.39% | 3.13% | 2.86% | 2.82% |
Drawdowns
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCCMX drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, which is greater than FAFAX's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCCMX and FAFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCCMX | FAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.57% | -19.07% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.76% | -3.73% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.20% | -16.11% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.57% | -16.11% | -8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -3.55% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -2.18% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 0.90% | +0.16% |
Volatility
LCCMX vs. FAFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) is 1.55%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class A (FAFAX) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that LCCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCCMX | FAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 2.12% | -0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 3.11% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 4.77% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 5.25% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.30% | 4.57% | +1.73% |