LCCMX vs. FADMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LCCMX (Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both mutual funds - LCCMX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by LEADER, while FADMX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, LCCMX returned 6.06%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for FADMX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCCMX charges 2.55%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FADMX.

Performance

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCCMX achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than FADMX's 3.29% return.

LCCMX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 6.33%
• 1Y: 11.06%
• 3Y*: 14.65%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 4.26%

FADMX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 3.71%
• 1Y: 9.92%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	3.89%	9.73%	18.51%	13.73%	-13.30%	1.30%	7.52%	0.65%	1.70%
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	3.29%	9.01%	6.02%	9.55%	-11.84%	3.46%	6.72%	11.06%	-2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LCCMX and FADMX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2018	0.38

The correlation between LCCMX and FADMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCCMX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCCMX

LCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
LCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

FADMX

FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCCMX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.93	-0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.49	4.43	+1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.03	1.62	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.91	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	17.16	-5.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCCMX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCCMX	FADMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	2.93	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.74	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.86	-0.05

Drawdowns

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCCMX drawdown since its inception was -24.57%, which is greater than FADMX's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCCMX and FADMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCCMX	FADMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.57%	-15.98%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.76%	-2.62%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.76%	-3.99%	+0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.20%	-15.98%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-3.07%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.60%	+0.46%

Volatility

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund (LCCMX) is 0.68%, while Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that LCCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCCMX	FADMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	1.35%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.12%	2.90%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.54%	3.50%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.84%	4.51%	+1.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.35%	4.77%	+1.58%

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCCMX has a 2.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCCMX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

LCCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%, more than FADMX's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund	4.28%	4.33%	4.16%	4.31%	2.91%	4.23%	3.82%	4.34%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCCMX Leader Short Term High Yield Bond Fund	8.53%	8.93%	10.39%	8.55%	5.68%	2.11%	2.11%	2.98%	2.89%	2.10%	2.01%	2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCCMX and FADMX in my portfolio?

LCCMX and FADMX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCCMX or FADMX?

FADMX has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to LCCMX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCCMX dropped -24.57% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FADMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.