PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEACX vs. GPARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SEACX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SEACX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEACX
Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund
-0.67%6.50%1.43%5.54%-11.55%-2.01%4.97%6.96%-0.12%2.24%
GPARX
GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund
4.77%7.42%4.20%6.87%-10.82%0.75%3.92%7.47%-1.64%4.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEACX achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SEACX has underperformed GPARX with an annualized return of 1.15%, while GPARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.27% annualized return.


SEACX

1D
0.54%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.19%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
3.33%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.15%

GPARX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
4.77%
6M
6.79%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SEACX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEACX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SEACX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEACX
SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GPARX
GPARX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GPARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPARX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GPARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEACX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEACXGPARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

1.65

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

2.19

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.35

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

10.80

-4.97

SEACX vs. GPARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the GPARX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEACX and GPARX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEACXGPARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.65

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.52

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.78

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.75

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between SEACX and GPARX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SEACX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison

SEACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than GPARX's 3.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SEACX
Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund
3.36%2.72%2.78%2.06%1.67%1.41%1.86%2.26%2.22%1.98%2.18%2.30%
GPARX
GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund
3.16%3.31%4.99%4.81%2.42%1.99%2.45%2.76%2.27%1.60%3.17%2.15%

Drawdowns

SEACX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEACX drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than GPARX's maximum drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEACX and GPARX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SEACXGPARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-15.56%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-4.68%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-15.56%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.96%

-15.56%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-1.46%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-2.40%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.02%

-0.24%

Volatility

SEACX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) is 1.62%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that SEACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SEACXGPARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

2.14%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

6.11%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

6.56%

-2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

4.94%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.88%

4.23%

-0.35%