SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE
SEAC.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and CBUG.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - SEAC.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while CBUG.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SEAC.DE returned 14.37%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for CBUG.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SEAC.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBUG.DE.
Performance
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEAC.DE achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 14.43% return.
SEAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 6M
- 15.29%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 9.72% | 1.57% | 23.09% | 24.89% | -20.42% | 3.60% |
CBUG.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) | 14.43% | 6.47% | 13.17% | 11.34% | -14.17% | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEAC.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SEAC.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEAC.DE
CBUG.DE
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEAC.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.94 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 14.66 | -13.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEAC.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.04 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.42 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, which is greater than CBUG.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAC.DE and CBUG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEAC.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -24.59% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -7.21% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -24.59% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | 0.00% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -7.48% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | 1.94% | +8.93% |
Volatility
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) is 3.05%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that SEAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEAC.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 3.41% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 9.78% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 13.90% | +11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 16.71% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.71% | +1.30% |
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEAC.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SEAC.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SEAC.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SEAC.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SEAC.DE.
SEAC.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SEAC.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEAC.DE and CBUG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer