SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE
SEAC.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) and IQQI.DE (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SEAC.DE tracks the MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped while IQQI.DE tracks the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SEAC.DE returned 10.67%/yr vs 6.76%/yr for IQQI.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SEAC.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IQQI.DE.
Performance
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEAC.DE achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than IQQI.DE's 10.36% return.
SEAC.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQI.DE
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.89%
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 9.72% | 1.57% | 23.09% | 24.89% | -20.42% | 36.15% | 7.56% | 32.13% | -0.88% |
IQQI.DE iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF | 10.36% | 0.54% | 14.51% | -3.16% | -0.37% | 26.96% | -10.83% | 27.76% | 10.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEAC.DE and IQQI.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2018 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SEAC.DE and IQQI.DE has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SEAC.DE
IQQI.DE
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SEAC.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 2.55 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 6.21 | -4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SEAC.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.17 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.33 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, smaller than the maximum IQQI.DE drawdown of -42.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEAC.DE and IQQI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEAC.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.50% | -42.25% | +9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.82% | -4.81% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.60% | -14.76% | -7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.64% | -24.81% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -3.21% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -11.06% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.87% | 1.98% | +8.89% |
Volatility
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (SEAC.DE) is 3.05%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) has a volatility of 3.88%. This indicates that SEAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEAC.DE | IQQI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 3.88% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 8.71% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 10.48% | +14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 12.70% | +5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 14.23% | +3.78% |
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEAC.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEAC.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Dividend Comparison
SEAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQI.DE iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF | 2.09% | 2.30% | 2.28% | 2.42% | 2.14% | 1.85% | 2.25% | 2.05% | 2.30% | 2.76% | 2.64% | 3.14% |
SEAC.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI World Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEAC.DE and IQQI.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEAC.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.
SEAC.DE tracks MSCI World SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SEAC.DE and 0.65% for IQQI.DE.
Find the right allocation for SEAC.DE and IQQI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer